How will your oncologist respond to this page?
"Hearsay? Anecdotal? Unscientific?"
In 1971 Richard Nixon announced the War on Cancer, and promised a cure by the 1977 bicentennial. In each of the 25 years since, more Americans have died of cancer than the year before.The failure of chemotherapy to control cancer has become apparent even to the oncology establishment.
Scientific American featured a recent cover story entitled: "The War on Cancer -- It's Being Lost." In it, eminent epidemiologist John C. Bailar III, MD, PhD, Chairman of the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at McGill University cited the relentless increase in cancer deaths in the face of growing use of toxic chemotherapy. He concluded that:
"Scientists must look in new directions if they are ever to
make progress against this unremitting killer."
________________________________________ |
The prestigious British Medical Journal - The Lancet, decrying the failure of conventional therapy to stop the rise in breast cancer deaths, noted the discrepancy between public perception and reality:
"If one were to believe all the media hype, the triumphalism of the [medical] profession in published research, and the almost weekly miracle breakthroughs trumpeted by the cancer charities, one might be surprised that women are dying at all from this cancer" it observed.
Noting that conventional therapies ... chemotherapy, radiation and surgery ... had been pushed to their limits with dismal results, the editorial called on researchers
to:
"Challenge dogma and redirect research efforts along more fruitful lines."
________________________________________ |
In an article entitled: "Chemotherapy: Snake-Oil Remedy?" that appeared in the Los Angeles Times of 1/9/87, Dr. Martin F. Shapiro explained that:
"while some oncologists inform their patients of the lack of evidence that treatments work ... others may well be misled by scientific papers that express unwarranted optimism about chemotherapy. Still others respond to an economic incentive. Physicians can earn much more money running active chemotherapy practices than they can providing solace and relief .... to dying patients and their families."
________________________________________ |
"Despite widespread use of chemotherapies, breast cancer mortality ...
has not changed in the last 70 years."
- Thomas Dao, MD, New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)
Mar 1975 292 p 707
|
Breast cancer activist Rose Kushner wrote:
"By 1981, indiscriminate, automatic adjuvant chemotherapy was replacing the Halsted radical mastectomy as therapeutic overkill in the United States."
Thomas Nealon MD, Professor of Surgery at NYU School of Medicine, concluded in 1990 that:
"The treatment of this (breast cancer) tumor now has slipped from too much surgery to too much adjuvant therapy."
________________________________________ |
Why so much use of chemotherapy if it does so little good? Well for one thing, drug companies provide huge economic incentives:
- In 1990, $3.53 billion was spent on chemotherapy.
- By 1994 that figure had more than doubled to $7.51 billion.
- This relentless increase in chemo use was accompanied by a relentless increase in cancer deaths.
________________________________________ |
Why the growth in chemotherapy in the face of such failure? A look at the financial interrelationships between a large cancer center such as Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the companies that make billions selling chemo drugs is revealing.
- James Robinson III, Chairman of the MSKCC Board of Overseers and Managers, is a director of Bristol-Myers Squibb, the world's largest producer of chemotherapy drugs.
- Richard Gelb, Vice-Chairman of the MSKCC board is Bristol-Myers Chairman of the Board.
- Richard Furlaud, another MSKCC board member, recently retired as Bristol Myers' president.
- Paul Marks MD, MSKCC's President and CEO, is a director of Pfizer.
________________________________________ |
It would seem quite alarming to many American citizens and patients, that North American Doctors themselves ... who are educated in North American Medicine, who everyday see the results of the Cancer treatments they are submitting their patients to ... would for the most part, refuse the same treatments if they were diagnosed with the same disease themselves:
In 1986, McGill Cancer Center Scientists sent a questionnaire to 118 doctors who treated non-small-cell lung cancer. More than 3/4 of them recruited patients and carried out trials of toxic drugs for lung cancer. They were asked to imagine that they themselves had cancer, and were asked which of six current trials they themselves would choose:
64 of the 79 respondents would not consent to be in a trial containing cisplatin, a common chemotherapy drug. Fifty eight found all the trials unacceptable. Their reason?
"The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable degree of toxicity."
________________________________________ |
Famed German biostatistician, Dr. Ulrich Abel PhD, also found in a similar 1989 study that:
"The personal views of many oncologists seem to be in striking contrast
to communications intended for the public."
________________________________________ |
Oncologist Albert Braverman MD wrote in 1991 that:
"No disseminated neoplasm (cancer) incurable in 1975 is curable today ... Many medical oncologists recommend chemotherapy for virtually any tumor, with a hopefulness undiscouraged by almost invariable failure."
________________________________________ |
In most common solid tumors ... lung, colon, breast, etc. ... chemotherapy is NOT curative:
|
|
|
Bladder Cancer: |
- No clinical trial done. |
|
|
|
|
|
Breast Cancer: |
- No direct evidence that chemotherapy prolongs survival in Breast Cancer ... it's use is "ethically questionable." |
|
|
|
|
|
Colorectal Cancer: |
- No evidence exists that survival is improved by chemotherapy. |
|
|
|
|
|
Corpus Uteri Cancer: |
- No improved survival. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cervix Cancer: |
- No improved survival. |
|
|
|
|
|
Gastric Cancer: |
- No clear evidence. |
|
|
|
|
|
Head Cancer: |
- No survival benefit, but occasional "positive effect" from shrinkage of tumors. |
|
|
|
|
|
Neck Cancer: |
- No survival benefit, but occasional "positive effect" from shrinkage of tumors. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ovarian Cancer: |
- No direct evidence, but probably a small advantage from cis-platinum regimens. But non-randomized comparisons "almost worthless for assessment of therapy." |
|
|
|
|
|
Pancreatic Cancer: |
- The largest study was "completely negative." Results showed a longer survival in the control group. |
________________________________________ |
Who is Dr. Glenn Warner, M.D.?
After graduation from Central Washington College of Education, he did a two-year stint as medical corpsman with the United States Marines and then got his medical degree from George Washington University in the District of Columbia. He did a surgical residency at Cook County Hospital in Chicago, followed by a pathology residency at the Tumor Institute of the Swedish Hospital.
Feeling the urge to be with actual patients, he gravitated from pathology slides to the patients themselves and eventually headed the immunotherapy department of the Tumor Institute under Orliss Wildermuth, MD.
________________________________________ |
"We have a multi-billion dollar industry that is killing people, right and left,
just for financial gain. Their idea of research is to see whether
two doses of this poison is better than three doses of that poison."
- Glenn A. Warner, M.D.
|
________________________________________ |
Ref: http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/alternative-cancer-treatment-2.html#on-chemotherapy
Ref: http://www.apricotsfromgod.info/chemotherapyreport.htm
Ref: http://www.holisticcancersolutions.com/efficacy_of_chemo.htm
|